请教:db2和oracle的性能比较,谁更强?

linda666 · 发表于 2002-9-26 13:40

最初由 runaway 发布
[B]认证并不代表一切，有OCP的证书也不能保证做好Oracle的工作，我已经在面试的时候毙了好几个OCP了，只知道考试，对Oracle没有任何真正的认识。 [/B]

老大，你都问的什么问题啊？？？

smzc · 发表于 2002-10-3 22:31

　　从在win2000 server 上的安装，及从DB2的安装介面上DB2明显不如Oracle(还是用的类似95的介面，加上JAVA的东西罢了），并且安装到一半，无任何提示信息就退出去了，我们银行也用DB2，我想只不过是,IBM 用不成熟的成品，拼命到你口袋里抢钱用。连在WIN98下的安装，如数据仓库也没有提示，不能安装上，如此产品，真的太臭了。
　　我也想考一个DB2的认证，因为DB2懂的人少，不过我现在不想去考了，就是考了，又有什么用，我情愿把Oracle搞精了，拿不拿证无所谓。

luna · 发表于 2002-10-3 22:43

学习学习

cheungpaul · 发表于 2002-10-5 22:10

這個可用來參考!

cheungpaul · 发表于 2002-10-6 09:01

這個是ORACLE 的 white paper!

charlietobey · 发表于 2002-10-7 16:21

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

Dennis68cn · 发表于 2002-10-7 16:38

其实DB2是收购了informix后才被人看好的，应该是informix做了DB2的强有力的支持，才有DB2的今天，不过说到性能，二者不相上下！DB2的限制更多！

cheungpaul · 发表于 2002-10-7 19:23

各有所長..不相上下..

jimruski · 发表于 2002-10-8 06:06

I am going to make an analogy here that some people might find odd, if so please just ignore it. Thanks.

DB2 to Oracle is like Jews to Arabs. Jews and Arabs are all descendents of Abraham, different wives of course. They are brothers, but nowadays they are deadly enemies to each other.

DB2 and Oracle are all based on the same research prototype IBM put out - System R. Legend has it that Larry Ellison "got hold of" the System R specifications and decided it was the next big thing. So he and a couple of guys wrote the first version of Oracle based on that spec. DB2 incidentally was based on System R too. So you see, Oracle and DB2 are really brothers. But still they are fighting each other to death.

Jimruski
=========================================

本事同更生, 乡间和太极

super_figo · 发表于 2002-10-8 10:58

agree with you

请教:db2和oracle的性能比较,谁更强?

老大，你都问的什么问题啊？？？

DB2 应不如ORACLE

DB2 and Oracle are brothers!

agree

浏览过的版块