|
原帖由 Yong Huang 于 2009-5-13 04:30 发表 ![]()
We're having the same problem with one of our databases right now. But we can't reproduce on two other databases. Here's a comparison:
DB-1: 8-node RAC, 10.2.0.4, RHEL 4, ASSM auto allocate, 8k block size
DB-2: single node, 10.2.0.4, RHEL 4, ASSM auto allocate, 8k block size
DB-3: 2-node RAC, 10.2.0.4, RHEL 5, ASSM auto allocate, 8k block size
The same data load always creates this space wastage problem on DB-1 and always works fine on -2 and -3. We can't find any solution and have to allocate huge space to -1 and shrink table after data load.
There's really no significant difference between them. DB-1 has db_writer_processes set to 2 and -2 and -3 have no such setting (default 1). Even that should be irrelevant.
Can you reproduce your problem on another same-version database?
Yong Huang
Doc ID: 729149.1
Subject: Table Growth Is Far More Than Expected
可以参考729149.1 是否存在过多的unformated blocks.
这个问题在我这里只有这一个表存在这个问题. 其它的数据库上没有发现. |
|